The following warning is observed with GCC 12 compilation:

In file included from ../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cn10k_cryptodev_ops.c:17:
In function ‘fill_sg_comp_from_iov’,
    inlined from ‘cpt_pdcp_chain_alg_prep’ at
        ../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h:1194:8,
    inlined from ‘cpt_fc_enc_hmac_prep’ at
        ../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h:1871:9,
    inlined from ‘fill_digest_params’ at
        ../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h:2829:8,
    inlined from ‘cpt_sym_inst_fill’ at
        ../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cn10k_cryptodev_ops.c:92:9,
    inlined from ‘cn10k_cpt_fill_inst.constprop’ at
        ../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cn10k_cryptodev_ops.c:146:10:
../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h:222:52: warning: array subscript 0 is
outside array bounds of ‘struct roc_se_buf_ptr[0]’ [-Warray-bounds]
  222 |           e_vaddr = (uint64_t)bufs[j].vaddr;
      |                               ~~~~~~~^~~~~~
../drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h:223:48: warning: array subscript 0 is
outside array bounds of ‘struct roc_se_buf_ptr[0]’ [-Warray-bounds]
  223 |           e_len = (size > bufs[j].size) ? bufs[j].size : size;
      |                           ~~~~~~~^~~~~

This patch resolves the warning.

Fixes: 3de331795f73 ("crypto/cnxk: add flexi cipher encryption")

Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Ankur Dwivedi <adwiv...@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h
index a339b80a87..0833167586 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_se.h
@@ -188,27 +188,27 @@ fill_sg_comp_from_iov(struct roc_se_sglist_comp *list, 
uint32_t i,
        int32_t j;
        uint32_t extra_len = extra_buf ? extra_buf->size : 0;
        uint32_t size = *psize;
-       struct roc_se_buf_ptr *bufs;
 
-       bufs = from->bufs;
        for (j = 0; (j < from->buf_cnt) && size; j++) {
+               struct roc_se_sglist_comp *to = &list[i >> 2];
+               uint32_t buf_sz = from->bufs[j].size;
+               void *vaddr = from->bufs[j].vaddr;
                uint64_t e_vaddr;
                uint32_t e_len;
-               struct roc_se_sglist_comp *to = &list[i >> 2];
 
                if (unlikely(from_offset)) {
-                       if (from_offset >= bufs[j].size) {
-                               from_offset -= bufs[j].size;
+                       if (from_offset >= buf_sz) {
+                               from_offset -= buf_sz;
                                continue;
                        }
-                       e_vaddr = (uint64_t)bufs[j].vaddr + from_offset;
-                       e_len = (size > (bufs[j].size - from_offset)) ?
-                                       (bufs[j].size - from_offset) :
+                       e_vaddr = (uint64_t)vaddr + from_offset;
+                       e_len = (size > (buf_sz - from_offset)) ?
+                                       (buf_sz - from_offset) :
                                        size;
                        from_offset = 0;
                } else {
-                       e_vaddr = (uint64_t)bufs[j].vaddr;
-                       e_len = (size > bufs[j].size) ? bufs[j].size : size;
+                       e_vaddr = (uint64_t)vaddr;
+                       e_len = (size > buf_sz) ? buf_sz : size;
                }
 
                to->u.s.len[i % 4] = rte_cpu_to_be_16(e_len);
-- 
2.28.0

Reply via email to