This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro wasn't available at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the function rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the signature but not in the associated function comments (doxygen). Should this function be considered experimental and the docs section updated or is this considered a stable function and the signature should updated?
Introduced in https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210630135158.8108-4-olivier.m...@6wind.com/ Thanks, Ben Magistro
