Sure. Will add a sentence about the issue which is getting fixed.
However, I have already added Fixes: 1dd6cffb6571 in the patch.
Is there anything else that needs to be done apart from this w.r.to
"Fixes:" comment?
Regards,
Subendu.
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 8:12 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 23/05/2022 12:53, Subendu Santra:
> > Hi Reshma, Thomas,
> >
> > What do you think about this patch?
>
> It looks to be a fix, right?
> Please add a sentence about the previous behaviour,
> explaining what is fixed.
>
> Ideally you should show the commit doing the mistake
> with the syntax "Fixes:" as in other commits of this tree.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:52 PM Subendu Santra <sube...@arista.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Show all non-owned ports when no port mask is specified
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1dd6cffb6571 ("app/procinfo: provide way to request info on owned
> > > ports")
> > > Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Subendu Santra <sube...@arista.com>
> > > ---
> > > app/proc-info/main.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/proc-info/main.c b/app/proc-info/main.c
> > > index 56070a3317..2be24b584e 100644
> > > --- a/app/proc-info/main.c
> > > +++ b/app/proc-info/main.c
> > > @@ -1504,10 +1504,10 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > if (nb_ports == 0)
> > > rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "No Ethernet ports - bye\n");
> > >
> > > - /* If no port mask was specified, then show non-owned ports */
> > > + /* If no port mask was specified, then show all non-owned ports */
> > > if (enabled_port_mask == 0) {
> > > RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i)
> > > - enabled_port_mask = 1ul << i;
> > > + enabled_port_mask |= (1ul << i);
> > > }
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) {
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
