> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 11:33 AM
> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Ji, Kai <kai...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev v2 1/2] build: add in option for qat use intel ipsec-mb
> lib
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:26:27AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 5/18/2022 9:04 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:16:51PM +0800, Kai Ji wrote:
> > > > Add in build option for QAT pmd use intel ipsec-mb lib
> > > > instead openssl for precompute partial hash & aes.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai...@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/common/qat/meson.build | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > meson_options.txt | 2 ++
> > > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/common/qat/meson.build
> b/drivers/common/qat/meson.build
> > > > index b7027f3164..d6eaff3e0e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/common/qat/meson.build
> > > > +++ b/drivers/common/qat/meson.build
> > > > @@ -35,6 +35,18 @@ if qat_crypto and not libcrypto.found()
> > > > 'missing dependency, libcrypto')
> > > > endif
> > > > +if get_option('qat_libipsecmb')
> > > > + IMB_required_ver = '1.0.0'
> > > > + libipsecmb = cc.find_library('IPSec_MB', required: false)
> > > > + if not lib.found()
> > > > + build = false
> > > > + reason = 'missing dependency, "libIPSec_MB"'
> > > > + else
> > > > + ext_deps += libipsecmb
> > > > + dpdk_conf.set('RTE_QAT_LIBIPSECMB', true)
> > > > + endif
> > > > +endif
> > > > +
> > >
> > > In general it's not a good idea for individual drivers to add top-level
> > > meson.build options. If every driver does this for all its options we will
> > > have an unmanageable set of hundreds of options. Unfortunately,
> though, I
> > > don't see a really good way to replace this with something other than a
> > > build option - I assume it's not just good enough to check which of the
> > > dependencies is found/not-found? Is there some way that this can be a
> > > generic option, that may be applicable to other drivers? Could the option
> > > be instead to prioritize FIPs compatibility?
> > >
> >
> > +1 to not have top level meson option for a driver.
> >
> > Will it work to give priority to intel-ipsec-mb lib, like when ipsec-mb
> > library exists use it, else use openssl?
>
> Looking at the patch a bit more, is there a reason why this cannot be made
> a run-time option when both libraries are available?
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the review.
Are you suggesting adding a EAL option to the QAT PMD?
Regards,
Fan
