Hello, On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:42 AM Wenwu Ma <wenwux...@intel.com> wrote: > > In vhost_user_msg_handler(), if vhost message handling > failed, we should check whether the queue is locked and > release the lock before returning. Or, it will cause a > deadlock later.
Fixes: 7f31d4ea05ca ("vhost: fix lock on device readiness notification") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Wenwu Ma <wenwux...@intel.com> > --- > lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c > index 1d390677fa..80a5df6e9d 100644 > --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c > +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c > @@ -3113,6 +3113,8 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) > send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx); > } else if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR) { > VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "(%s) vhost message handling > failed.\n", dev->ifname); > + if (unlock_required) > + vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev); > return -1; > } > This fixes the issue, but my concern is that changes in the future might introduce a new return statement (forgetting to unlock). I suggest having a single return statement, like: diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c index 1d390677fa..4baf969ee0 100644 --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c @@ -2976,7 +2976,6 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) return -1; } - ret = 0; request = ctx.msg.request.master; if (request > VHOST_USER_NONE && request < VHOST_USER_MAX && vhost_message_str[request]) { @@ -3113,9 +3112,11 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) send_vhost_reply(dev, fd, &ctx); } else if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR) { VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "(%s) vhost message handling failed.\n", dev->ifname); - return -1; + ret = -1; + goto unlock; } + ret = 0; for (i = 0; i < dev->nr_vring; i++) { struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->virtqueue[i]; bool cur_ready = vq_is_ready(dev, vq); @@ -3126,10 +3127,11 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) } } +unlock: if (unlock_required) vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev); - if (!virtio_is_ready(dev)) + if (ret != 0 || !virtio_is_ready(dev)) goto out; /* @@ -3156,7 +3158,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) } out: - return 0; + return ret; } static int process_slave_message_reply(struct virtio_net *dev, -- David Marchand