Hi Akhil,

Minor nit inline. 

With that addressed,
Series Acked-by: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>

Thanks,
Anoob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 12:55 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> <jer...@marvell.com>; abhinandan.guj...@intel.com;
> jay.jayatheert...@intel.com; narender.vang...@intel.com; Volodymyr
> Fialko <vfia...@marvell.com>; Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com>; Fan Zhang
> <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] cryptodev: add APIs to get/set event metadata
> 
> From: Volodymyr Fialko <vfia...@marvell.com>
> 
> Currently, crypto session userdata is used to set event crypto metadata from
> the application and the driver is dereferencing it in driver which is not 
> correct.
> User data is meant to be opaque to the driver.
> To support this, new API is added to get and set event crypto metadata. The
> new API, rte_cryptodev_set_session_event_mdata,
> allows setting event metadata in session private data which is filled inside
> PMD using a new cryptodev op. This operation can be performed on any of
> the PMD supported sessions (sym/asym/security).
> For SW abstraction of event crypto adapter to be used by eventdev library, a
> new field is added in asymmetric crypto session for now and for symmetric
> case, current implementation of using userdata is used. Symmetric cases
> cannot be fixed now, as it will be ABI breakage which will be resolved in DPDK
> 22.11.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Fialko <vfia...@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/cryptodev/cryptodev_pmd.c | 16 +++++++++++++
> lib/cryptodev/cryptodev_pmd.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 44
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/cryptodev/version.map     |  4 ++++
>  5 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> 

[snip]
 
> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> index 3500a2d470..5ebc423afa 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> @@ -2051,6 +2051,9 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_session_free(uint8_t dev_id,
> void *sess)
> 
>       dev->dev_ops->asym_session_clear(dev, sess);
> 
> +     if (((struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *)sess)->event_mdata !=
> NULL)
> +             rte_free(((struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *)sess)-
> >event_mdata);
> +

[Anoob] rte_free would do a NULL check. So the other NULL check may not be 
required.

Reply via email to