Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> writes:

> <snip>
>
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:05 PM Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > TBH, I did not test Travis by lack of interest (plus I don't want to
>> > > be bothered with their ui / credit stuff).
>> > > We could consider dropping Travis in the near future.
>> > >
>> > > Opinions?
>> >
>> > I think it makes sense.  We haven't had travis reports in a while
>> > because their credit system made it impossible to use.  We had kept it
>> > around for users of travis, but at this point, I think most people
>> > have migrated to GHA.
>> >
>> 
>> Honnappa, do you see an issue if we stop maintaining the Travis configuration
>> in the DPDK repo?
> I do not see much of an issue from Arm side. The machines in the UNH lab 
> provide the cover.
>
> I am wondering that this might still be useful for individual
> developers who I believe are not affected by the Travis's credit
> system (I am not sure on this).

I don't use travis now that GHA "just works" for my private
repositories.  I would guess most developers will prefer GHA anyway.

>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> --
>> David Marchand

Reply via email to