Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> writes: > <snip> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:05 PM Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > TBH, I did not test Travis by lack of interest (plus I don't want to >> > > be bothered with their ui / credit stuff). >> > > We could consider dropping Travis in the near future. >> > > >> > > Opinions? >> > >> > I think it makes sense. We haven't had travis reports in a while >> > because their credit system made it impossible to use. We had kept it >> > around for users of travis, but at this point, I think most people >> > have migrated to GHA. >> > >> >> Honnappa, do you see an issue if we stop maintaining the Travis configuration >> in the DPDK repo? > I do not see much of an issue from Arm side. The machines in the UNH lab > provide the cover. > > I am wondering that this might still be useful for individual > developers who I believe are not affected by the Travis's credit > system (I am not sure on this).
I don't use travis now that GHA "just works" for my private repositories. I would guess most developers will prefer GHA anyway. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> David Marchand