Hi Stephen,
We were going through the patch set:
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20200715212228.28010-7-step...@networkplumber.org/
and hoping to get clarification on the behaviour if post mask is not specified
in the input to `dpdk-proc-info` tool.
Specifically, In PATCH v3 6/7, we see this:
+ /* If no port mask was specified, one will be provided */
+ if (enabled_port_mask == 0) {
+ RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i) {
+ enabled_port_mask |= 1u << i;
However, in PATCH v4 8/8, we see this:
+ /* If no port mask was specified, then show non-owned ports */
+ if (enabled_port_mask == 0) {
+ RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i)
+ enabled_port_mask = 1ul << i;
+ }
Was there any specific reason to show just the last non-owned port in case the
port mask was not specified?
Should we show all non-owned ports in case the user doesn’t specify any port
mask?
Regards,
Subendu.
