Hi David,

Thanks for your work.

On 2022-04-08 11:41:16 +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Looking at this driver history, there was never a need for including
> execinfo.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderl...@corigine.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cpp_pcie_ops.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cpp_pcie_ops.c 
> b/drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cpp_pcie_ops.c
> index bad80a5a1c..08bc4e8ef2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cpp_pcie_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cpp_pcie_ops.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
>  
>  #include <assert.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
> -#if defined(RTE_BACKTRACE)
> -#include <execinfo.h>
> -#endif
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <stdint.h>
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

Reply via email to