Hi Brandon,
Following some cleanup patches I have posted against examples/fips, I would 
like to take enabling AES_CBC in fips validation.
Please let me know if you/anyone have already have WIP for the same, before I 
proceed.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brandon Lo <b...@iol.unh.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 7:12 PM
> To: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>;
> Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add JSON vector set support to fips
> validation
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Adding the dev mailing list back into this discussion.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 9:13 AM Brandon Lo <b...@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Lincoln and I would like to know if we can get this patch set looked
> > at and merged before submitting the rest of the algorithms. So far,
> > I've worked on implementing the HMAC and CMAC tests, but I keep
> > getting pulled away by some requests from the community. This patchset
> > does not seem to break backward compatibility, so merging it will only
> > lead to more coverage from the UNH lab. It may also be easier to
> > review since it isn't going to be one huge patchset that needs to be
> > looked at in the future.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 7:47 AM Brandon Lo <b...@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:16 AM Brandon Lo <b...@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> > > > I only have the AES-GCM algorithm implemented because the current
> > > > implementations of the other algorithms require some extra
> > > > information than what comes with the JSON format in the API.
> > > > For example, I couldn't find the JSON counterpart for things like
> > > > fips_validation_sha.c's "MD =" or "Seed =" as well as
> > > > fips_validation_ccm.c's extra test types like CCM-DVPT, CCM-VADT,
> etc.
> > > > just to name a few.
> > > > This could very well be due to my inexperience with the FIPS
> > > > validation, and I definitely plan to take another look at it again.
> > > >
> > > > My assumption is that the JSON version of FIPS validation files
> > > > isn't used as much as the old CAVP format, so I am more aiming
> > > > towards getting something working in the lab first and then
> > > > expanding on it later.
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Could I get someone to look at this patch set?
> > > The UNH lab is ready to deploy FIPS testing on patches that affect
> > > the crypto portion of DPDK.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Brandon
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Brandon Lo
> > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory
> > > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 b...@iol.unh.edu
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__www.iol.unh.edu&
> > > d=DwIBaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=EAtr-
> g7yUFhtOio8r2Rtm13Aqe4WVp_S
> > >
> _gHpcu6KFVo&m=35t4n1T3FnlAkNla3EmGLgWSAhIknbuvLgguNAXKjN0xCMs
> cV7HXyJ
> > >
> 95BftFMJJJ&s=GVCZy3E9sE9H23TSCEcLyQoT4zxNQ4pyameEW76PZno&e=
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Brandon Lo
> > UNH InterOperability Laboratory
> > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 b...@iol.unh.edu
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__www.iol.unh.edu&d=
> > DwIBaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=EAtr-
> g7yUFhtOio8r2Rtm13Aqe4WVp_S_gHp
> >
> cu6KFVo&m=35t4n1T3FnlAkNla3EmGLgWSAhIknbuvLgguNAXKjN0xCMscV7H
> XyJ95BftF
> > MJJJ&s=GVCZy3E9sE9H23TSCEcLyQoT4zxNQ4pyameEW76PZno&e=
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Brandon Lo
> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 b...@iol.unh.edu
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__www.iol.unh.edu&d=DwIBaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=EAtr-
> g7yUFhtOio8r2Rtm13Aqe4WVp_S_gHpcu6KFVo&m=35t4n1T3FnlAkNla3EmG
> LgWSAhIknbuvLgguNAXKjN0xCMscV7HXyJ95BftFMJJJ&s=GVCZy3E9sE9H23T
> SCEcLyQoT4zxNQ4pyameEW76PZno&e=

Reply via email to