On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:27:32 +0200 Michał Krawczyk <m...@semihalf.com> wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, indeed the issue reproduces in the secondary process. > > Basically ENA v2.2.1 is not MP aware, meaning it cannot be used safely > from the secondary process. The main obstacle is the admin queue which > is used for processing the hardware requests which can be used safely > only from the primary process. It's not strictly a bug, as we weren't > exposing 'MP Awareness' in the PMD features list, it's more like a > lack of proper MP support. > > The latest ENA PMD release should be MP safe. We currently don't have > PMD backport ready for the older LTS release (but we're planning to do > so for ENA v2.6.0 on the amzn-drivers repository: > https://github.com/amzn/amzn-drivers/tree/master/userspace/dpdk). I wish that ENA did not have its own versioning scheme. Driver versions are meaningful only to the driver writer/vendor, they don't help the end user. Since backporting is not part of stable process. I suggest doing what XDP did for 21.11 and earlier releases. diff --git a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c index 634c97acf60d..3778349f3fe9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c @@ -3212,6 +3212,12 @@ static int ena_rx_queue_intr_disable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, static int eth_ena_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused, struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev) { + if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY) { + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, + "Ena PMD does not support secondary processes\n"); + return -ENOTSUP; + } + return rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe(pci_dev, sizeof(struct ena_adapter), eth_ena_dev_init); }