https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995
Bug ID: 995
Summary: acl: field size=8 (u64) is not working
Product: DPDK
Version: 21.11
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: other
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: i...@cgstowernetworks.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 199
--> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=199&action=edit
test-acl app patch that adds u64 field and input files
Hi
ACL with field size 8 (for u64) is not working
struct rte_acl_field_def acl_fields[] =
{
...
{
...
.size = sizeof(uint64_t),
...
}
...
}
Attached are 2 examples:
1. test-acl-64.patch -
It slightly expands the existing test-acl app with an u64 field
When using a rule that the u64 field is don't care (mask is all 0) it passes
bash app/test-acl/test-acl.sh build/app/dpdk-test-acl
app/test-acl/input_u64_mask_0/ scalar 32
ACL: trie 0: number of rules: 1, indexes: 3
test acl1v4_1_rule OK
But when using a rule with u64 value that should match it fails
bash app/test-acl/test-acl.sh build/app/dpdk-test-acl
app/test-acl/input_u64_mask_F/ scalar 32
ACL: trie 0: number of rules: 1, indexes: 4
--- acl1v4_1_rule_E6Gkks.chk 2022-04-17 20:39:25.803425601 +0300
+++ acl1v4_1_rule_E6Gkks.out 2022-04-17 20:39:25.803425601 +0300
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0
+4294967295
test acl1v4_1_rule FAILED
2. acl-test-64.c
a small standalone app (can be compiled like any dpdk/example) with simple 2
fields ACL (the mandatory first one byte field + an u64 field) with hard-coded
values that should match but do not.
it can be run w/o any params
examples/acl-test-u64/build/acl-test-u64 --no-huge -c 1
NO-MATCH - test FAILED!
notes:
1. It doesn't work for RTE_ACL_FIELD_TYPE_RANGE/MASK too
2. Looks like if using only the 4 MSBs and masking the 4 LSBs (e.g. mask =
0xFFFFFFFF00000000) it does work
Thanx,
Ido
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
