On 26/03/15 01:20, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:43 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Zoltan Kiss
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: use library routines instead of 
>> local copies
>>
>> This macro and function were copies from the mbuf library, no reason to keep
>> them.
>
> NACK
> You can't use RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT macro here.
> If you'll look at vhost code carefully, you'll realise that we don't use 
> standard rte_pktmbuf_attach() here.
> As we attach mbuf not to another mbuf but to external memory buffer, passed 
> to us by virtio device.
> Look at attach_rxmbuf_zcp().
Yes, I think the proper fix is to set the flag in attach_rxmbuf_zcp() 
and virtio_tx_route_zcp(), then you can use the library macro here.

> Though I suppose, we can replace pktmbuf_detach_zcp() , with  
> rte_pktmbuf_detach() - they are doing identical things.
Yes, the only difference is that the latter do "m->ol_flags = 0" as well.

> BTW, I wonder did you ever  test your patch?
Indeed I did not, shame on me. I don't have a KVM setup at hand. This 
fix were born as a side effect of the cleaning up in the library,
and I'm afraid I don't have the time right now to create a KVM setup. 
Could anyone who has it at hand help out to run a quick test? (for the 
v2 of this patch, which I'll send in shortly)

Regards,

Zoltan

> My guess it would cause vhost with '--zero-copy' to crash or  corrupt the 
> packets straightway.
>
> Konstantin
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   examples/vhost/main.c | 38 +++++---------------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/examples/vhost/main.c b/examples/vhost/main.c
>> index c3fcb80..1c998a5 100644
>> --- a/examples/vhost/main.c
>> +++ b/examples/vhost/main.c
>> @@ -139,8 +139,6 @@
>>   /* Number of descriptors per cacheline. */
>>   #define DESC_PER_CACHELINE (RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE / sizeof(struct 
>> vring_desc))
>>
>> -#define MBUF_EXT_MEM(mb)   (RTE_MBUF_FROM_BADDR((mb)->buf_addr) != (mb))
>> -
>>   /* mask of enabled ports */
>>   static uint32_t enabled_port_mask = 0;
>>
>> @@ -1538,32 +1536,6 @@ attach_rxmbuf_zcp(struct virtio_net *dev)
>>      return;
>>   }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Detach an attched packet mbuf -
>> - *  - restore original mbuf address and length values.
>> - *  - reset pktmbuf data and data_len to their default values.
>> - *  All other fields of the given packet mbuf will be left intact.
>> - *
>> - * @param m
>> - *   The attached packet mbuf.
>> - */
>> -static inline void pktmbuf_detach_zcp(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>> -{
>> -    const struct rte_mempool *mp = m->pool;
>> -    void *buf = RTE_MBUF_TO_BADDR(m);
>> -    uint32_t buf_ofs;
>> -    uint32_t buf_len = mp->elt_size - sizeof(*m);
>> -    m->buf_physaddr = rte_mempool_virt2phy(mp, m) + sizeof(*m);
>> -
>> -    m->buf_addr = buf;
>> -    m->buf_len = (uint16_t)buf_len;
>> -
>> -    buf_ofs = (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM <= m->buf_len) ?
>> -                    RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM : m->buf_len;
>> -    m->data_off = buf_ofs;
>> -
>> -    m->data_len = 0;
>> -}
>>
>>   /*
>>    * This function is called after packets have been transimited. It fetchs 
>> mbuf
>> @@ -1590,8 +1562,8 @@ txmbuf_clean_zcp(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vpool 
>> *vpool)
>>
>>      for (index = 0; index < mbuf_count; index++) {
>>              mbuf = __rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(vpool->pool);
>> -            if (likely(MBUF_EXT_MEM(mbuf)))
>> -                    pktmbuf_detach_zcp(mbuf);
>> +            if (likely(RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(mbuf)))
>> +                    rte_pktmbuf_detach(mbuf);
>>              rte_ring_sp_enqueue(vpool->ring, mbuf);
>>
>>              /* Update used index buffer information. */
>> @@ -1653,8 +1625,8 @@ static void mbuf_destroy_zcp(struct vpool *vpool)
>>      for (index = 0; index < mbuf_count; index++) {
>>              mbuf = __rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(vpool->pool);
>>              if (likely(mbuf != NULL)) {
>> -                    if (likely(MBUF_EXT_MEM(mbuf)))
>> -                            pktmbuf_detach_zcp(mbuf);
>> +                    if (likely(RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(mbuf)))
>> +                            rte_pktmbuf_detach(mbuf);
>>                      rte_ring_sp_enqueue(vpool->ring, (void *)mbuf);
>>              }
>>      }
>> @@ -2149,7 +2121,7 @@ switch_worker_zcp(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
>>                                      }
>>                                      while (likely(rx_count)) {
>>                                              rx_count--;
>> -                                            pktmbuf_detach_zcp(
>> +                                            rte_pktmbuf_detach(
>>                                                      pkts_burst[rx_count]);
>>                                              rte_ring_sp_enqueue(
>>                                                      vpool_array[index].ring,
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>

Reply via email to