On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:51:32 +0000 Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > > > Regarding naming, you should also consider renaming > > rte_seqlock_write_begin/end() to rte_seqlock_write_lock/unlock(), > > following the naming convention of the other locks. This could > > prepare for future extensions, such as rte_seqlock_write_trylock(). > > Just a thought; I don't feel strongly about this. Semantics and naming should be the same as Linux kernel or you risk having to reeducate too many people.
