On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:28 AM <lon...@linuxonhyperv.com> wrote:
>
> From: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
>
> The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the value to decide
> the correct way to calculate checksums.
It's better to describe what the impact for an application is.
Do I understand correctly that UDP checksum offloading was broken?
I guess you want this backported.
Fixes: 4e9c73e96e83 ("net/netvsc: add Hyper-V network device")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> index 028f176c7e..34f40be5b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> @@ -1348,8 +1348,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt,
> *pi_data = NDIS_LSO2_INFO_MAKEIPV4(hlen,
> m->tso_segsz);
> }
> - } else if (m->ol_flags &
> - (RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM |
> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
> + } else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM ||
> + (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM ||
> + (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
> pi_data = hn_rndis_pktinfo_append(pkt, NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_SIZE,
> NDIS_PKTINFO_TYPE_CSUM);
> *pi_data = 0;
> @@ -1363,9 +1366,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt,
> *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_IPCS;
> }
>
> - if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> + if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKTCPCS(hlen);
> - else if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> + else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKUDPCS(hlen);
> }
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
David Marchand
