David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:01 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: >> >> 18/03/2022 15:35, David Marchand: >> > +ABI Changes >> > +----------- >> > + >> > +.. This section should contain ABI changes. Sample format: >> > + >> > + * sample: Add a short 1-2 sentence description of the ABI change >> > + which was announced in the previous releases and made in this >> > release. >> > + Start with a scope label like "ethdev:". >> > + Use fixed width quotes for ``function_names`` or ``struct_names``. >> > + Use the past tense. >> > + >> > + This section is a comment. Do not overwrite or remove it. >> > + Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin. >> > + ======================================================= >> > + >> > +* No ABI change that would break compatibility with 21.11. >> >> Should we say 21.11 and 22.03? > > In practice, compatibility is probably maintained, but we are > committed to maintain ABI compatibility with v21.11 only. > So I would leave this as is. > > http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/27c97b09-0b78-ccbc-db1e-860ac6012...@ashroe.eu/ Agreed +1 - our only commitment is to v21.11. Otherwise things would start to get very complicated. :-) -- Regards, Ray K
