On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:18:49PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-03-20 15:07, Butler, Siobhan A:
> > I propose we also add a bug tracking tool (e.g. Bugzilla or other).
>
> Don't you think adding a bug tracker would artificially split discussions
> between mailing list threads and bug tracker entries?
> I think patchwork is great because it summarizes patches pending on the
> mailing list without breaking the discussion flow.
> Maybe that a tool which collect bug discussions - as patchwork do for
> the patches - would be ideal?
>
> > And also a standalone page/document/archive of FAQ's.
>
> Which kind of questions do you want to answer?
> You're adding some technical questions in the release notes, which is great.
> Are you thinking to anything else?
>
> Thanks
>
This hasn't proven to be the case anywhere else. Bugs tend to be something a
small number of interested parties get involved with ("interested" being defined
by the MAINTANIERS list). Once a bug is root caused and a solution developed,
the list is used to debate its merits.
The kernel has done this for years with kernel.bugzilla.org, and it works quite
well.
Neil
