> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 4:10 PM
> To: Jiang, YuX <yux.ji...@intel.com>; bugzi...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [Bug 937] [dpdk-22.03]
> unit_tests_mempool/test_mempool_perf: timeout on
> mempool_perf_autotest
>
> > From: Jiang, YuX [mailto:yux.ji...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2022 11.31
> >
> > > From: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 6:16 PM
> > >
> > > > From: bugzi...@dpdk.org [mailto:bugzi...@dpdk.org]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2022 10.11
> > > >
> > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=937
> > > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > dpdk-22.03-rc1: 2e07139b66a810883871ff20a5f31e4c222e5b40
> > > >
> > > > Reproduce Step:
> > > >
> > > > 1.launch dpdk-test
> > > > x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/test/dpdk-test -l 1-111 -n 4 2.
> > > > RTE>>mempool_perf_autotest
> > > >
> > > > Expect results: mempool_perf_autotest timeout in 2000s.
> > > >
> > > > Actual results: mempool_perf_autotest need run 1 or more hours.
> > > >
> > > > Is this issue a regression: Y
> > > > Version the regression was introduced: Specify git id if known.
> > > > First bad commit:ed579e50c66db90485593c6c79f5366a57145f2a
> > > > Author: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > > Date: Mon Jan 24 15:59:53 2022 +0100
> > > >
> > > > mempool: test performance with constant n
> > > >
> > > > "What gets measured gets done."
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds mempool performance tests where the number of
> > objects
> > > > to put and get is constant at compile time, which may
> > > > significantly improve the performance of these functions. [*]
> > > >
> > > > Also, it is ensured that the array holding the object used for
> > testing
> > > > is cache line aligned, for maximum performance.
> > > >
> > > > And finally, the following entries are added to the list of tests:
> > > > - Number of kept objects: 512
> > > > - Number of objects to get and to put: The number of pointers
> > fitting
> > > > into a cache line, i.e. 8 or 16
> > > >
> > >
> > > A few more test cases were added, and each test is now run in two
> > variants,
> > > one variant with variable N, and one variant with constant N.
> > >
> > > To reduce the very long test running time, we could consider
> > > removing
> > some
> > > of the tests. However, a few undocumented magic numbers are used
> > > throughout DPDK, e.g. a burst size of 32. These magic numbers do not
> > have
> > > names, but are just used numerically. So I am not sure if we can
> > safely
> > > remove the tests with burst size 4 and/or 128 kept objects. E.g. I
> > suspect that
> > > 4 could be a magic number in some NIC drivers, and thus still
> > relevant to test.
> > >
> > >
> > Do you mean that this is normal behavior due to this merged patch? How
> > long this mempool_perf_autotest will take? 1 more hours or several
> > hours?
>
> It was running for 2-3 hours on our server.
>
> -Morten
Thanks Morten, so you mean this is normal behavior, right?
