On February 10, 2022 3:07 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 2/9/2022 10:42 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > Remove 'DEBUGFUNC' due to too many invalid debug log prints. And fix
> > that double line was added by using 'DEBUGOUT'.
> >
> > Fixes: cc934df178ab ("net/ngbe: add log and error types")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawe...@trustnetic.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ngbe/ngbe_logs.h | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ngbe/ngbe_logs.h
> > b/drivers/net/ngbe/ngbe_logs.h index fd306419e6..b7d78fb400 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ngbe/ngbe_logs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ngbe/ngbe_logs.h
> > @@ -15,9 +15,12 @@ extern int ngbe_logtype_init;
> > "%s(): " fmt "\n", __func__, ##args)
> >
> > extern int ngbe_logtype_driver;
> > -#define PMD_DRV_LOG(level, fmt, args...) \
> > +#define PMD_TLOG_DRIVER(level, fmt, args...) \
> > rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, ngbe_logtype_driver, \
> > - "%s(): " fmt "\n", __func__, ##args)
> > + "%s(): " fmt, __func__, ##args)
> > +
> > +#define PMD_DRV_LOG(level, fmt, args...) \
> > + PMD_TLOG_DRIVER(level, fmt "\n", ## args)
> >
>
> Both 'DEBUGOUT' and 'PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, ..' are in use for same thing,
> but one appends '\n' other doesn't, this is very error prune and there are
> already wrong usage in the driver.
> I think no need to add complexity for something as simple as this, what do you
> think to unify the DEBUG level macros, at least unify the line ending
> behavior?
>
>
> > #ifdef RTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_RX
> > extern int ngbe_logtype_rx;
> > @@ -37,10 +40,10 @@ extern int ngbe_logtype_tx;
> > #define PMD_TX_LOG(level, fmt, args...) do { } while (0)
> > #endif
> >
> > -#define TLOG_DEBUG(fmt, args...) PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, fmt, ##args)
> > +#define TLOG_DEBUG(fmt, args...) PMD_TLOG_DRIVER(DEBUG, fmt,
> ##args)
> >
> > #define DEBUGOUT(fmt, args...) TLOG_DEBUG(fmt, ##args)
> > #define PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE() TLOG_DEBUG(" >>")
>
> What is difference between 'PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE' and 'DEBUGFUNC'?
> As far as I can see they are for same reason, and both macros are used. If
> they
> are for same reason can you please unify the usage?
>
> > -#define DEBUGFUNC(fmt) TLOG_DEBUG(fmt)
> > +#define DEBUGFUNC(fmt) do { } while (0)
>
> If 'DEBUGFUNC' can be removed, why not removing from the code, instead of
> above define? This is your driver, you have full control on it.
Okay. I just realize that this is going to be a big change, so I want to keep
it to a minimum.
Anyway, 'DEBUGFUNC' should be removed, because 'DEBUGOUT' already contains the
function name.
