On 1/28/2022 9:55 AM, kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel wrote:
> +static int > +tap_mp_req_start_rxtx(const struct rte_mp_msg *request, __rte_unused const void *peer) > +{I asked last time but I don't remember the response, what should be in the 'peer' variable? The peer variable is currently unused. The primary does not expect any response from secondary processes. Should we change the model to rte_mp_request_sync rather than rte_mp_send_msg?
No need to change, I asked because I wasn't clear what 'peer' is for, as checked, it is the address of the sender which is used to reply, so not useful in this case.
