> Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs
> On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B
> This patch replaces it with index-based implementation,
> where in each buffer is addressed by (pool base address + index)
> It reduces the amount of memory/cache required for per core cache
> 
> L3Fwd performance testing reveals minor improvements in the cache
> performance (L1 and L2 misses reduced by 0.60%)
> with no change in throughput

I feel really sceptical about that patch and the whole idea in general:
- From what I read above there is no real performance improvement observed.
  (In fact on my IA boxes mempool_perf_autotest reports ~20% slowdown,
  see below for more details). 
- Space utilization difference looks neglectable too.
- The change introduces a new build time config option with a major limitation:
   All memzones in a pool have to be within the same 4GB boundary. 
   To address it properly, extra changes will be required in init(/populate) 
part of the code.
   All that will complicate mempool code, will make it more error prone
   and harder to maintain.
But, as there is no real gain in return - no point to add such extra complexity 
at all.

Konstantin

CSX 2.1 GHz
==========

echo 'mempool_perf_autotest' | ./dpdk-test -n 4 --lcores='6-13' --no-pci

params :                                                                        
                          rate_persec   
                                                                                
                                 (normal/index-based/diff %)
(with cache)
cache=512 cores=1 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=32 : 
740989337.00/504116019.00/-31.97
cache=512 cores=1 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=128 : 
756495155.00/615002931.00/-18.70
cache=512 cores=2 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=32 : 
1483499110.00/1007248997.00/-32.10
cache=512 cores=2 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=128 : 
1512439807.00/1229927218.00/-18.68
cache=512 cores=8 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=32 : 
5933668757.00/4029048421.00/-32.10
cache=512 cores=8 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=128 : 
6049234942.00/4921111344.00/-18.65

(with user-owned cache)
cache=512 cores=1 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=32 : 
630600499.00/504312627.00/-20.03
 cache=512 cores=1 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=128 : 
756259225.00/615042252.00/-18.67
 cache=512 cores=2 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=32 : 
1262052966.00/1007039283.00/-20.21
 cache=512 cores=2 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=128 : 
1517853081.00/1230818508.00/-18.91
 cache=512 cores=8 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=32 
:5054529533.00/4028052273.00/-20.31
 cache=512 cores=8 n_get_bulk=32 n_put_bulk=32 n_keep=128 : 
6059340592.00/4912893129.00/-18.92

> 
> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> ---
>  lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h             | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  lib/mempool/rte_mempool_ops_default.c |   7 ++
>  2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> index 1e7a3c15273c..4fabd3b1920b 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@
>  #include <rte_memcpy.h>
>  #include <rte_common.h>
> 
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +#include <rte_vect.h>
> +#endif
> +
>  #include "rte_mempool_trace_fp.h"
> 
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
> @@ -239,6 +243,9 @@ struct rte_mempool {
>       int32_t ops_index;
> 
>       struct rte_mempool_cache *local_cache; /**< Per-lcore local cache */
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +     void *pool_base_value; /**< Base value to calculate indices */
> +#endif
> 
>       uint32_t populated_size;         /**< Number of populated objects. */
>       struct rte_mempool_objhdr_list elt_list; /**< List of objects in pool */
> @@ -1314,7 +1321,19 @@ rte_mempool_cache_flush(struct rte_mempool_cache 
> *cache,
>       if (cache == NULL || cache->len == 0)
>               return;
>       rte_mempool_trace_cache_flush(cache, mp);
> +
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +     unsigned int i;
> +     unsigned int cache_len = cache->len;
> +     void *obj_table[RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * 3];
> +     void *base_value = mp->pool_base_value;
> +     uint32_t *cache_objs = (uint32_t *) cache->objs;
> +     for (i = 0; i < cache_len; i++)
> +             obj_table[i] = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value, cache_objs[i]);
> +     rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, obj_table, cache->len);
> +#else
>       rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, cache->objs, cache->len);
> +#endif
>       cache->len = 0;
>  }
> 
> @@ -1334,8 +1353,13 @@ static __rte_always_inline void
>  rte_mempool_do_generic_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, void * const *obj_table,
>                          unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache)
>  {
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +     uint32_t *cache_objs;
> +     void *base_value;
> +     uint32_t i;
> +#else
>       void **cache_objs;
> -
> +#endif
>       /* increment stat now, adding in mempool always success */
>       RTE_MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_bulk, 1);
>       RTE_MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_objs, n);
> @@ -1344,7 +1368,13 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, 
> void * const *obj_table,
>       if (unlikely(cache == NULL || n > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE))
>               goto ring_enqueue;
> 
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +     cache_objs = (uint32_t *) cache->objs;
> +     cache_objs = &cache_objs[cache->len];
> +     base_value = mp->pool_base_value;
> +#else
>       cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len];
> +#endif
> 
>       /*
>        * The cache follows the following algorithm
> @@ -1354,13 +1384,40 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, 
> void * const *obj_table,
>        */
> 
>       /* Add elements back into the cache */
> +
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +#if defined __ARM_NEON
> +     uint64x2_t v_obj_table;
> +     uint64x2_t v_base_value = vdupq_n_u64((uint64_t)base_value);
> +     uint32x2_t v_cache_objs;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < (n & ~0x1); i += 2) {
> +             v_obj_table = vld1q_u64((const uint64_t *)&obj_table[i]);
> +             v_cache_objs = vqmovn_u64(vsubq_u64(v_obj_table, v_base_value));
> +             vst1_u32(cache_objs + i, v_cache_objs);
> +     }
> +     if (n & 0x1) {
> +             cache_objs[i] = (uint32_t) RTE_PTR_DIFF(obj_table[i], 
> base_value);
> +     }
> +#else
> +     for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +             cache_objs[i] = (uint32_t) RTE_PTR_DIFF(obj_table[i], 
> base_value);
> +     }
> +#endif
> +#else
>       rte_memcpy(&cache_objs[0], obj_table, sizeof(void *) * n);
> +#endif
> 
>       cache->len += n;
> 
>       if (cache->len >= cache->flushthresh) {
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +             rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, obj_table + cache->len - 
> cache->size,
> +                             cache->len - cache->size);
> +#else
>               rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, &cache->objs[cache->size],
>                               cache->len - cache->size);
> +#endif
>               cache->len = cache->size;
>       }
> 
> @@ -1461,13 +1518,22 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, 
> void **obj_table,
>  {
>       int ret;
>       uint32_t index, len;
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +     uint32_t i;
> +     uint32_t *cache_objs;
> +#else
>       void **cache_objs;
> -
> +#endif
>       /* No cache provided or cannot be satisfied from cache */
>       if (unlikely(cache == NULL || n >= cache->size))
>               goto ring_dequeue;
> 
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +     void *base_value = mp->pool_base_value;
> +     cache_objs = (uint32_t *) cache->objs;
> +#else
>       cache_objs = cache->objs;
> +#endif
> 
>       /* Can this be satisfied from the cache? */
>       if (cache->len < n) {
> @@ -1475,8 +1541,14 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, 
> void **obj_table,
>               uint32_t req = n + (cache->size - cache->len);
> 
>               /* How many do we require i.e. number to fill the cache + the 
> request */
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +             void *temp_objs[RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * 3]; /**< Cache 
> objects */
> +             ret = rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bulk(mp,
> +                     temp_objs, req);
> +#else
>               ret = rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bulk(mp,
>                       &cache->objs[cache->len], req);
> +#endif
>               if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>                       /*
>                        * In the off chance that we are buffer constrained,
> @@ -1487,12 +1559,50 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, 
> void **obj_table,
>                       goto ring_dequeue;
>               }
> 
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +             len = cache->len;
> +             for (i = 0; i < req; ++i, ++len) {
> +                     cache_objs[len] = (uint32_t) RTE_PTR_DIFF(temp_objs[i],
> +                                                             base_value);
> +             }
> +#endif
>               cache->len += req;
>       }
> 
>       /* Now fill in the response ... */
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +#if defined __ARM_NEON
> +     uint64x2_t v_obj_table;
> +     uint64x2_t v_cache_objs;
> +     uint64x2_t v_base_value = vdupq_n_u64((uint64_t)base_value);
> +
> +     for (index = 0, len = cache->len - 1; index < (n & ~0x3); index += 4,
> +                                             len -= 4, obj_table += 4) {
> +             v_cache_objs = vmovl_u32(vld1_u32(cache_objs + len - 1));
> +             v_obj_table = vaddq_u64(v_cache_objs, v_base_value);
> +             vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)obj_table, v_obj_table);
> +             v_cache_objs = vmovl_u32(vld1_u32(cache_objs + len - 3));
> +             v_obj_table = vaddq_u64(v_cache_objs, v_base_value);
> +             vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)(obj_table + 2), v_obj_table);
> +     }
> +     switch (n & 0x3) {
> +     case 3:
> +             *(obj_table++) = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value, 
> cache_objs[len--]);
> +                                                             /* fallthrough 
> */
> +     case 2:
> +             *(obj_table++) = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value, 
> cache_objs[len--]);
> +                                                             /* fallthrough 
> */
> +     case 1:
> +             *(obj_table++) = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value, 
> cache_objs[len--]);
> +     }
> +#else
> +     for (index = 0, len = cache->len - 1; index < n; ++index, len--, 
> obj_table++)
> +             *obj_table = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value, cache_objs[len]);
> +#endif
> +#else
>       for (index = 0, len = cache->len - 1; index < n; ++index, len--, 
> obj_table++)
>               *obj_table = cache_objs[len];
> +#endif
> 
>       cache->len -= n;
> 
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool_ops_default.c 
> b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool_ops_default.c
> index 22fccf9d7619..3543cad9d4ce 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool_ops_default.c
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool_ops_default.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,13 @@ rte_mempool_op_populate_helper(struct rte_mempool *mp, 
> unsigned int flags,
>               obj = va + off;
>               obj_cb(mp, obj_cb_arg, obj,
>                      (iova == RTE_BAD_IOVA) ? RTE_BAD_IOVA : (iova + off));
> +#ifdef RTE_MEMPOOL_INDEX_BASED_LCORE_CACHE
> +             /* Store pool base value to calculate indices for index-based
> +              * lcore cache implementation
> +              */
> +             if (i == 0)
> +                     mp->pool_base_value = obj;
> +#endif
>               rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, &obj, 1);
>               off += mp->elt_size + mp->trailer_size;
>       }
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to