>>>> >>
>>>> >> In crypto producer mode, producer core enqueues cryptodev with
>>>> >> software generated crypto ops and worker core dequeues crypto
>>>> >> completion events from the eventdev. Event crypto metadata used for
>>>> >> above processing is pre- populated in each crypto session.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Parameter --prod_type_cryptodev can be used to enable crypto producer
>>>> >mode.
>>>> >> Parameter --crypto_adptr_mode can be set to select the crypto adapter
>>>> >> mode,
>>>> >0
>>>> >> for OP_NEW and 1 for OP_FORWARD.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This mode can be used to measure the performance of crypto adapter.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Example:
>>>> >>   ./dpdk-test-eventdev -l 0-2 -w <EVENTDEV> -w <CRYPTODEV> -- \
>>>> >>   --prod_type_cryptodev --crypto_adptr_mode 1 --test=perf_atq \
>>>> >>   --stlist=a --wlcores 1 --plcores 2
>>>> >
>>>> >This patch has some perf failure as shown below. Could you please look 
>>>> >into
>>>> this?
>>>> >105300 --> performance testing fail
>>>> >
>>>> >Test environment and result as below:
>>>> >
>>>> >Ubuntu 20.04
>>>> >Kernel: 4.15.0-generic
>>>> >Compiler: gcc 7.4
>>>> >NIC: Intel Corporation Ethernet Converged Network Adapter 82599ES 10000
>>>> >Mbps
>>>> >Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>>>> >Fail/Total: 0/4
>>>> >
>>>> >Detail performance results:
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| frame_size | txd/rxd | num_cpus | num_threads |  throughput
>>>> >| difference from
>>>> >|
>>>> >|            |         |          |             |           expected      
>>>> >     |
>>>>
>>>>+============+=========+==========+=============+==========
>==
>>>=
>>>> >=================+
>>>> >| 64         | 512     | 1        | 1           | 0.3%                    
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 2048    | 1        | 1           | -0.2%                   
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 512     | 1        | 2           | 0.0%                    
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 2048    | 1        | 2           | 0.3%                    
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >
>>>> >Ubuntu 20.04
>>>> >Kernel: 4.15.0-generic
>>>> >Compiler: gcc 7.4
>>>> >NIC: Intel Corporation Ethernet Converged Network Adapter XL710-QDA2
>>>> >40000 Mbps
>>>> >Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>>>> >Fail/Total: 1/4
>>>> >
>>>> >Detail performance results:
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| frame_size | txd/rxd | num_cpus | num_threads |  throughput
>>>> >| difference from
>>>> >|
>>>> >|            |         |          |             |           expected      
>>>> >     |
>>>>
>>>>+============+=========+==========+=============+==========
>==
>>>=
>>>> >=================+
>>>> >| 64         | 512     | 1        | 1           | 0.2%                    
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 2048    | 1        | 1           | -0.7%                   
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 512     | 1        | 2           | -1.5%                   
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 2048    | 1        | 2           | -5.3%                   
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >
>>>> >Ubuntu 20.04 ARM
>>>> >Kernel: 4.15.0-132-generic
>>>> >Compiler: gcc 7.5
>>>> >NIC: Arm Intel Corporation Ethernet Converged Network Adapter
>>>> >XL710-QDA2
>>>> >40000 Mbps
>>>> >Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>>>> >Fail/Total: 0/2
>>>> >
>>>> >Detail performance results:
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| frame_size | txd/rxd | num_cpus | num_threads |  throughput
>>>> >| difference from
>>>> >|
>>>> >|            |         |          |             |           expected      
>>>> >     |
>>>>
>>>>+============+=========+==========+=============+==========
>==
>>>=
>>>> >=================+
>>>> >| 64         | 512     | 1        | 1           | 0.1%                    
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >| 64         | 2048    | 1        | 1           | -0.5%                   
>>>> >     |
>>>> >+------------+---------+----------+-------------+------------------------------+
>>>> >
>>>> >To view detailed results, visit:
>>>> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>>>>
>>>>3A__lab.dpdk.org_results_dashboard_patchsets_20534_&d=DwIFAg&c=nKj
>We
>>>> c2
>>>>
>>b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=G9w4KsPaQLACBfGCL35PtiRH996yqJDxAZwrWegU2qQ&
>>>> m=
>>>>
>>>>dPDgmKiLC_KqhgjwZrodyFlBdlFPgckVr9IW0c7t2cIHpkw6u9pGqgElFqqwuU1v&
>s
>>>> =E
>>>> >ajYUFziZY27q6LB4p5sOGuFlty3VlOjbMsLXaQ5MeI&e=
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Performance regression is reported by nic_single_core_perf, but is using
>>>> testpmd to measure performance. As this patch does not touch testpmd, the
>>>> issue could be with DPDK CI. Is it possible to re-trigger CI ?
>>>I have don't have option to trigger CI from my side.
>>>So, I have added dpdklab and Aaron to the loop.
>>>Please check with them.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Abhinandan.
>>
>> Aaron,
>> From DTS, I only see testpmd being used for nic_single_core_perf test.
>> This patch is not touching testpmd, but still got failure for the perf test.
>> If possible, Please re-retrigger CI for this patch.
>
>Seems this was superseded - I am guessing no new test needs to be run
>for this:
>
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>3A__patches.dpdk.org_project_dpdk_patch_736dc424a780b9547033f76f8911342f
>f06d3f87.1641292088.git.sthotton-
>40marvell.com_&d=DwIBAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=G9w4KsPaQLACBf
>GCL35PtiRH996yqJDxAZwrWegU2qQ&m=qAw77KHlJ3Gr9aLNyRrJFhgKWJM-
>y3Rgjlf3TZlNeM4vM7hontySZ4inIBL6ehjB&s=uWo5o2-
>22qVZRfYgG3swzbFeYJYtzrjJTPxsgBZGo30&e=
>
>Is that correct?

Yes, the patch is superseded.
CI is passing for v3. nic_single_core_perf numbers may not be consistent.

Reply via email to