On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/6/2021 8:35 AM, jer...@marvell.com wrote:
> > From: Jerin Jacob<jer...@marvell.com>
> >
> > As per the deprecation notice, In the view of enabling unified driver
> > for octeontx2(cn9k)/octeontx3(cn10k), removing drivers/octeontx2
> > drivers and replace with drivers/cnxk/ which
> > supports both octeontx2(cn9k) and octeontx3(cn10k) SoCs.
> >
> > This patch does the following
> >
> > - Replace drivers/common/octeontx2/ with drivers/common/cnxk/
> > - Replace drivers/mempool/octeontx2/ with drivers/mempool/cnxk/
> > - Replace drivers/net/octeontx2/ with drivers/net/cnxk/
> > - Replace drivers/event/octeontx2/ with drivers/event/cnxk/
> > - Replace drivers/crypto/octeontx2/ with drivers/crypto/cnxk/
> > - Rename config/arm/arm64_octeontx2_linux_gcc as
> > config/arm/arm64_cn9k_linux_gcc
> > - Update the documentation and MAINTAINERS to reflect the same.
> > - Change the reference to OCTEONTX2 as OCTEON 9. The kernel related
> > documentation is not accounted for this change as kernel documentation
> > still uses OCTEONTX2.
> >
> > Depends-on: series-20804 ("common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions")
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob<jer...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 37 -
> > app/test/meson.build | 1 -
> > app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 7 -
> > app/test/test_cryptodev.h | 1 -
> > app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 17 -
> > app/test/test_eventdev.c | 8 -
> > config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc | 1 -
> > ...teontx2_linux_gcc => arm64_cn9k_linux_gcc} | 3 +-
> > config/arm/meson.build | 10 +-
> > devtools/check-abi.sh | 4 +
> > doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/octeontx2.ini | 87 -
> > doc/guides/cryptodevs/index.rst | 1 -
> > doc/guides/cryptodevs/octeontx2.rst | 188 -
> > doc/guides/dmadevs/cnxk.rst | 2 +-
> > doc/guides/eventdevs/features/octeontx2.ini | 30 -
> > doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst | 1 -
> > doc/guides/eventdevs/octeontx2.rst | 178 -
> > doc/guides/mempool/index.rst | 1 -
> > doc/guides/mempool/octeontx2.rst | 92 -
> > doc/guides/nics/cnxk.rst | 4 +-
> > doc/guides/nics/features/octeontx2.ini | 97 -
> > doc/guides/nics/features/octeontx2_vec.ini | 48 -
> > doc/guides/nics/features/octeontx2_vf.ini | 45 -
> > doc/guides/nics/index.rst | 1 -
> > doc/guides/nics/octeontx2.rst | 465 ---
> > doc/guides/nics/octeontx_ep.rst | 4 +-
> > doc/guides/platform/cnxk.rst | 12 +
> > .../octeontx2_packet_flow_hw_accelerators.svg | 2804 --------------
> > .../img/octeontx2_resource_virtualization.svg | 2418 ------------
> > doc/guides/platform/index.rst | 1 -
> > doc/guides/platform/octeontx2.rst | 520 ---
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 17 -
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst | 12 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst | 6 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_02.rst | 8 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_05.rst | 4 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_08.rst | 6 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 8 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_02.rst | 10 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst | 6 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst | 2 +-
>
> Not sure about updating old release notes files, using 'octeontx2' still can
> make
> sense for the context of those releases.
OK. I will send v2 with keeping octeontx2 in OLD release notes.
>
> Also search still gives some instances of 'octeontx2', like
> 'devtools/check-abi.sh'
> one, can you please confirm if OK to have them:
> $git grep -i octeontx2
This change to skip octeontx2 driver for ABI check as it is removed.
This change is needed.
if grep -qE "\<librte_*.*_octeontx2" $dump; then
echo "Skipped removed driver $name."
>
> Except from above items, agree with change in principal and build test looks
> good:
> Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
