> -----Original Message----- > From: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89...@bytedance.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 17:20 > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.w...@intel.com>; lian...@liangbit.com; Bin Zheng > <zhengbin.89...@bytedance.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] net/ixgbe: fix spelling mistakes > > fix comment spelling mistakes > > Signed-off-by: Bin Zheng <zhengbin.89...@bytedance.com> > --- > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > index 5811749b95..4654d0adec 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct > rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, > * Under the circumstance that `rx_tail` wrap back to zero > * and the advance speed of `rx_tail` is greater than `rxrearm_start`, > * `rx_tail` will catch up with `rxrearm_start` and surpass it. > - * This may cause some mbufs be reused by applicaion. > + * This may cause some mbufs be reused by application.
This is your patch 1's, just submit the 1 & 2 by one patch. > * > * So we need to make some restrictions to ensure that > * `rx_tail` will not exceed `rxrearm_start`. > -- > 2.25.1
