On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:44 AM Elena Agostini <eagost...@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com>
>
> > Date: Tuesday, 16 November 2021 at 20:09
>
> > To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>
> > Cc: Elena Agostini <eagost...@nvidia.com>, dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>,
> > Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] app/testpmd: add GPU memory option in iofwd
> > engine
>
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:42 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > On 11/16/2021 6:06 PM, Elena Agostini wrote:
>
> > > > > From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, 16 November 2021 at 19:00
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > To: Elena Agostini <eagost...@nvidia.com>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>, Slava Ovsiienko
> > > > <viachesl...@nvidia.com>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] app/testpmd: add GPU memory option in
> > > > iofwd engine
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > On 11/11/2021 9:41 PM, eagost...@nvidia.com wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > --- a/app/test-pmd/meson.build
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/meson.build
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ if dpdk_conf.has('RTE_HAS_JANSSON')
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > ext_deps += jansson_dep
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > endif
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > -deps += ['ethdev', 'gro', 'gso', 'cmdline', 'metrics', 'bus_pci']
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > > +deps += ['ethdev', 'gro', 'gso', 'cmdline', 'metrics', 'bus_pci',
> > > > 'gpudev']>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > I didn't review the set, but in a very high level do we want to add
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > 'gpudev' as dependency? Isn't this like adding 'rawdev' as
> > > > dependency.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > gpudev is a library that can be built without a gpu driver as all the
> > > > other libraries
>
> > > >
>
> > > > and itis actually used only in case of GPU memory mempool.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Reasons for this patch are:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > - Have an upstreamed benchmark tool to measure network metrics using
> > > > GPU memory
>
> > > >
>
> > > > - Test some DPDK features not really tested anywhere like the external
> > > > memory mempool feature
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > I can see the reason, that is obvious, yet again why we are not adding
> > > rawdev
>
> > > testing to the testpmd? But adding gpudev.
>
> > > It is easier to add it to the testpmd, and for some testing perspective it
>
> > > makes sense, but still I am not quite sure about this new dependency, I
> > > would
>
> > > like to get more feedback.
>
> >
>
> > I had the similar concern earlier. IMO, It is better to have a
>
> > separate test application for gpudev like
>
> > other device classes. For eventdev cases when it needs to work with
>
> > ethdev for Rx adapter cases,
>
> > We have enabled such code in app/test-eventdev to make testpmd focus on
> > ethdev.
>
>
>
> gpudev already has a test app in app/test-gpudev.
>
>
>
> gpudev needs to be also test with network card and today another application
>
> decidated to test gpudev over the network would be very similar to testpmd io.
>
>
>
> At this stage, there is no point in reinventing the wheel
I think, it is not about not reinventing the wheel, It is about
maintenance of testpmd,
currently, the feature are specific to ethdev. Adding more
cross-device-specific features
will populate the testpmd. I had a similar case when it network cases
need to be integrated to eventdev,
I choose to have it test-eventdev so that testpmd focus remains for ethdev.
