From: Narcisa Vasile <navas...@microsoft.com>
As a new API for threading is introduced,
a set of unit tests have been added to test the new interface.
Verify that the mutex correctly locks/unlocks and protects the data.
Check both static and dynamic mutexes.
Signed-off-by: Narcisa Vasile <navas...@microsoft.com>
---
app/test/test_threads.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 106 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_threads.c b/app/test/test_threads.c
index 00f604ab7e..91155a04e3 100644
--- a/app/test/test_threads.c
+++ b/app/test/test_threads.c
@@ -243,6 +243,110 @@ test_thread_barrier(void)
return 0;
}
+RTE_INIT_MUTEX(static_mutex);
+
+struct mutex_loop_args {
+ rte_thread_barrier *barrier;
+ rte_thread_mutex *mutex;
+ unsigned long result_A;
+ unsigned long result_B;
+};
+
+static void *
+thread_loop_mutex_B(void *arg)
+{
+ struct mutex_loop_args *args = arg;
+
+ if (rte_thread_mutex_try_lock(args->mutex) == 0) {
+ rte_thread_barrier_wait(args->barrier);
+ rte_thread_mutex_unlock(args->mutex);
+ args->result_B = 1;
+ } else {
+ rte_thread_barrier_wait(args->barrier);
+ args->result_B = 2;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *
+thread_loop_mutex_A(void *arg)
+{
+ struct mutex_loop_args *args = arg;
+
+ if (rte_thread_mutex_try_lock(args->mutex) != 0) {
+ rte_thread_barrier_wait(args->barrier);
+ args->result_A = 2;
+ } else {
+ rte_thread_barrier_wait(args->barrier);
+ rte_thread_mutex_unlock(args->mutex);
+ args->result_A = 1;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int
+test_thread_mutex(rte_thread_mutex *pmutex)
+{
+ rte_thread_t thread_A;
+ rte_thread_t thread_B;
+ rte_thread_mutex mutex;
+ rte_thread_barrier barrier;
+ struct mutex_loop_args args;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* If mutex is not statically initialized */
+ if (pmutex == NULL) {
+ ret = rte_thread_mutex_init(&mutex);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to initialize mutex!");
+ } else
+ mutex = *pmutex;
+
+ ret = rte_thread_barrier_init(&barrier, 2);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to initialize barrier!");
+
+ args.mutex = &mutex;
+ args.barrier = &barrier;
+
+ ret = rte_thread_create(&thread_A, NULL, thread_loop_mutex_A, &args);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to create thread!");
+
+ ret = rte_thread_create(&thread_B, NULL, thread_loop_mutex_B, &args);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to create thread!");
+
+ ret = rte_thread_join(thread_A, NULL);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to join thread!");
+
+ ret = rte_thread_join(thread_B, NULL);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to join thread!");
+
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(args.result_A != args.result_B, "Mutex failed to be
acquired or was acquired by both threads!");
+
+ /* Destroy if dynamically initialized */
+ if (pmutex == NULL) {
+ ret = rte_thread_mutex_destroy(&mutex);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to destroy mutex!");
+ }
+
+ ret = rte_thread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to destroy barrier!");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+test_thread_mutex_static(void)
+{
+ return test_thread_mutex(&static_mutex);
+}
+
+static int
+test_thread_mutex_dynamic(void)
+{
+ return test_thread_mutex(NULL);
+}
+
static struct unit_test_suite threads_test_suite = {
.suite_name = "threads autotest",
.setup = NULL,
@@ -253,6 +357,8 @@ static struct unit_test_suite threads_test_suite = {
TEST_CASE(test_thread_attributes_priority),
TEST_CASE(test_thread_detach),
TEST_CASE(test_thread_barrier),
+ TEST_CASE(test_thread_mutex_static),
+ TEST_CASE(test_thread_mutex_dynamic),
TEST_CASES_END()
}
};
--
2.31.0.vfs.0.1
