On 11/5/21 4:16 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 05/11/2021 04:03, Xia, Chenbo:
>> From: stable <stable-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>>
>>> 'eth_dev->data' can be null before ethdev allocated. The API walks
>>> through all eth devices, at least for some data can be null.
>>>
>>> Adding 'eth_dev->data' null check before accessing it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 33c73aae32e4 ("ethdev: allow ownership operations on unused port")
>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> [...]
>>> @@ -757,10 +757,13 @@ rte_eth_dev_owner_delete(const uint64_t owner_id)
>>>       rte_spinlock_lock(&eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
>>>
>>>       if (eth_is_valid_owner_id(owner_id)) {
>>> -             for (port_id = 0; port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; port_id++)
>>> -                     if (rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner.id == 
>>> owner_id)
>>> -                             memset(&rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner, 
>>> 0,
>>> +             for (port_id = 0; port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; port_id++) {
>>> +                     struct rte_eth_dev_data *data =
>>> +                             rte_eth_devices[port_id].data;
>>> +                     if (data != NULL && data->owner.id == owner_id)
> 
> Indeed the NULL check was missing.
> 
>> Acked-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo....@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> 

Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>

Reply via email to