On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:03:21 +0000
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Ben,
> 
> I also don’t think 64 is a common case here.
> For such cases we probably should think up some different approach for the 
> reassembly table.

Larger values make it easier to DoS the IP fragment table.
See the Linux fragsmack vulnerability.

Reply via email to