On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:03:21 +0000 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Ben, > > I also don’t think 64 is a common case here. > For such cases we probably should think up some different approach for the > reassembly table. Larger values make it easier to DoS the IP fragment table. See the Linux fragsmack vulnerability.