I'm on it. SPDK is using DPDK 21.08 now, we will bump to DPDK 21.11 in next SPDK 22.01 release.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 5:10 PM > To: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>; Maxime Coquelin > <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Liu, Changpeng <changpeng....@intel.com>; Thomas > Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>; > dpdklab <dpdk...@iol.unh.edu>; c...@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct > > Hi David, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 4:36 PM > > To: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin > > <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Liu, Changpeng <changpeng....@intel.com>; Thomas > Monjalon > > <tho...@monjalon.net>; Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>; dpdklab > > <dpdk...@iol.unh.edu>; c...@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct > > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com> wrote: > > > Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses > > > this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it > > > adapts to DPDK 21.11 > > > > Please, no. > > We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". > > > > The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. > > You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. > > Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 > > > > Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. > > Thanks for the heads up! > > > > > > > In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle > > this change. > > Already + Changpeng in the cc list > > Changpeng, could you help with the change? > > Thanks, > Chenbo > > > Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build > > tested again in CI. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > David Marchand
