2015-03-02 17:03, zhihong.wang at intel.com: > Fixed strict-aliasing rules breaking errors for some GCC version. > > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang at intel.com> > --- > .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h | 44 > ++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h > b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h > index 69a5c6f..f412099 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h > @@ -195,6 +195,8 @@ rte_mov256blocks(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src, size_t > n) > static inline void * > rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) > { > + uintptr_t dstu = (uintptr_t)dst; > + uintptr_t srcu = (uintptr_t)src; > void *ret = dst; > int dstofss; > int bits; > @@ -204,22 +206,22 @@ rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) > */ > if (n < 16) { > if (n & 0x01) { > - *(uint8_t *)dst = *(const uint8_t *)src; > - src = (const uint8_t *)src + 1; > - dst = (uint8_t *)dst + 1; > + *(uint8_t *)dstu = *(const uint8_t *)srcu; > + srcu = (uintptr_t)((const uint8_t *)srcu + 1); > + dstu = (uintptr_t)((uint8_t *)dstu + 1); [...]
Is there another solution? Are we going to acknowledge this fix?