Make these messages more specific.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c
index 84b13925ff..a4a22f32c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ sfc_mae_rule_parse_item_port_id(const struct 
rte_flow_item *item,
        if (rc != 0) {
                return rte_flow_error_set(error, rc,
                                RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
-                               "Can't find RTE ethdev by the port ID");
+                               "Can't get m-port for the given ethdev");
        }
 
        rc = efx_mae_match_spec_mport_set(ctx_mae->match_spec,
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ sfc_mae_rule_parse_item_port_representor(const struct 
rte_flow_item *item,
        if (rc != 0) {
                return rte_flow_error_set(error, rc,
                                RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
-                               "Can't find RTE ethdev by the port ID");
+                               "Can't get m-port for the given ethdev");
        }
 
        rc = efx_mae_match_spec_mport_set(ctx_mae->match_spec,
@@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ sfc_mae_rule_parse_action_port_id(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
        rc = sfc_mae_switch_get_ethdev_mport(mae->switch_domain_id,
                                             port_id, &mport);
        if (rc != 0) {
-               sfc_err(sa, "failed to find MAE switch port SW entry for RTE 
ethdev port %u: %s",
+               sfc_err(sa, "failed to get m-port for the given ethdev 
(port_id=%u): %s",
                        port_id, strerror(rc));
                return rc;
        }
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to