Make these messages more specific. Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> --- drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c index 84b13925ff..a4a22f32c6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ sfc_mae_rule_parse_item_port_id(const struct rte_flow_item *item, if (rc != 0) { return rte_flow_error_set(error, rc, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item, - "Can't find RTE ethdev by the port ID"); + "Can't get m-port for the given ethdev"); } rc = efx_mae_match_spec_mport_set(ctx_mae->match_spec, @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ sfc_mae_rule_parse_item_port_representor(const struct rte_flow_item *item, if (rc != 0) { return rte_flow_error_set(error, rc, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item, - "Can't find RTE ethdev by the port ID"); + "Can't get m-port for the given ethdev"); } rc = efx_mae_match_spec_mport_set(ctx_mae->match_spec, @@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ sfc_mae_rule_parse_action_port_id(struct sfc_adapter *sa, rc = sfc_mae_switch_get_ethdev_mport(mae->switch_domain_id, port_id, &mport); if (rc != 0) { - sfc_err(sa, "failed to find MAE switch port SW entry for RTE ethdev port %u: %s", + sfc_err(sa, "failed to get m-port for the given ethdev (port_id=%u): %s", port_id, strerror(rc)); return rc; } -- 2.20.1