There is no reason why we should use the "reserve" tailq api, since the pci entry is already statically reserved.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com> --- lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 2 +- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c index e692b35..4d2fbbb 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ rte_eal_pci_init(void) { TAILQ_INIT(&pci_driver_list); TAILQ_INIT(&pci_device_list); - uio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_RESERVE_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, uio_res_list); + uio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, uio_res_list); /* for debug purposes, PCI can be disabled */ if (internal_config.no_pci) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c index 6d4932d..8f44f09 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c @@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ rte_eal_pci_init(void) { TAILQ_INIT(&pci_driver_list); TAILQ_INIT(&pci_device_list); - pci_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_RESERVE_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, - mapped_pci_res_list); + pci_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, + mapped_pci_res_list); /* for debug purposes, PCI can be disabled */ if (internal_config.no_pci) -- 1.7.10.4