Hi Stephen,
Sure, no problem with that.
I probably changed that line together with something else in some earlier
version and didn't notice it now.
Thanks,
Wojtek
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 5:11 PM
To: Liguzinski, WojciechX <wojciechx.liguzin...@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu,
Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Ajmera, Megha <megha.ajm...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v17 2/5] example/qos_sched: add PIE support
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:49:59 +0000
"Liguzinski, WojciechX" <wojciechx.liguzin...@intel.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> b/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c index dbc878b553..895c0d3592 100644
> --- a/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> +++ b/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,6 @@ app_worker_thread(struct thread_conf **confs)
> if (likely(nb_pkt)) {
> int nb_sent = rte_sched_port_enqueue(conf->sched_port,
> mbufs,
> nb_pkt);
> -
> APP_STATS_ADD(conf->stat.nb_drop, nb_pkt - nb_sent);
> APP_STATS_ADD(conf->stat.nb_rx, nb_pkt);
> }
Unnecessary whitespace change, drop this in next revision?
