> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:58 PM
> To: Tudor Cornea <tudor.cor...@gmail.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zh...@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
> <haiyue.w...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: initialize max_rx_pkt_len if
> rlpml_set_vf fails
> 
> On 10/15/2021 3:20 PM, Tudor Cornea wrote:
> > Some of our customers use ESXi 6.0 or 6.5 servers, which could have
> > older versions of the PF ixgbe driver.
> > It seems that with a more recent version of the PMD driver, we are not
> > able to initialize 82599EB ports correctly.
> > This scenario seems to have worked with DPDK 19.11.
> >
> > Would it be possible to print a warning, while still allowing the
> > driver to initialize the ports ?

There is a scenario that we initialize the port successful, with no any error, 
but we cannot get any packets.
So keep printing error or warning and still allowing the driver to initialize 
the port may be the best solution.

> >
> > I was also thinking about the return code of ixgbevf_dev_set_mtu.
> > Do you think it would be more appropriate to return ENOTSUP or ENOSYS
> > instead of EINVAL ?

If ixgbevf_dev_set_mtu fails, we have no way to know it because of invalid 
value or not supported?
ixgbevf_dev_set_mtu returns one the these values: 0 or IXGBE_ERR_MBX

> >
> > As a user, calling 'rte_eth_dev_mtu_set', I would expect an error like
> > EINVAL to suggest to me that the mtu value which I provided is
> > incorrect [1]. The 82599 NIC, however has some particularities related
> > to mtu, which could cause the operation to fail. I was thinking that
> > EINVAL might not be most descriptive error.
> >
> > [1] https://doc.dpdk.org/api/rte__ethdev_8h.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tudor
> 
> Hi Tudor,
> 
> Can you please check if the patch is still after 'max_rx_pkt_len' related 
> changes
> in next-net?
> 
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 17:06, Tudor Cornea <tudor.cor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It seems that if the call to ixgbevf_rlpml_set_vf fails, we will not
> >> initialize dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len correctly anymore.
> >>
> >> This happens with a 82599EB NIC and a VMware ESXI 6.0 setup, and is
> >> causing VF the ports to fail to initialize
> >>
> >> We see the following error:
> >> ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(): Set max packet length to 1518 failed.
> >>
> >> Investigating over DPDK 19.11, it seems that the call still fails,
> >> but it doesn't exit prematurely, and max_rx_pkt_len is initialized in
> >> the respective case.
> >>
> >> On the ESXi server, we seem to have the following driver
> >> net-ixgbe: 3.7.13.7.14iov-20vmw.600.0.0.2494585
> >>
> >> It seems that the behavior related to MTU setting has changed since
> >> the following commit:
> >>
> >> commit c77866a16904 ("net/ixgbe: detect failed VF MTU set")
> >>
> >> We would like to still be able to support older setups if possible,
> >> as we might have customers running ESXi 6.0 or 6.5, and these seem to
> >> have an older version of the PF driver as default.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tudor Cornea <tudor.cor...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> >>   drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c   | 1 -
> >>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >> index 4dbe049..4301dfd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >> @@ -6369,6 +6369,9 @@ ixgbevf_dev_set_mtu(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >> uint16_t mtu)
> >>                  return -EINVAL;
> >>          }
> >>
> >> +       /* update max frame size */
> >> +       dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len = max_frame;
> >> +
> >>          /*
> >>           * When supported by the underlying PF driver, use the
> >> IXGBE_VF_SET_MTU
> >>           * request of the version 2.0 of the mailbox API.
> >> @@ -6381,8 +6384,6 @@ ixgbevf_dev_set_mtu(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >> uint16_t mtu)
> >>          if (ixgbevf_rlpml_set_vf(hw, max_frame))
> >>                  return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> -       /* update max frame size */
> >> -       dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len = max_frame;
> >>          return 0;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index 0ac89cb..02d9809 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >> @@ -5677,7 +5677,6 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >>              (uint16_t)dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len)) {
> >>                  PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Set max packet length to %d
> failed.",
> >>
> dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len);
> >> -               return -EINVAL;
> >>          }
> >>
> >>          /*
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >>

Reply via email to