On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:02 PM Medvedkin, Vladimir <vladimir.medved...@intel.com> wrote: > > I am confused. > > Does it mean that rte_jhash_32b is not compliant with rte_hash_create API? > > > > I think so too, because despite the fact that the ABI is the same, the > API remains different with respect to the length argument.
Sorry I don't follow you with "ABI is the same". Can you explain please? I am not against the fix, but it seems to test something different than what an application using the hash library would do. Or if an application directly calls this hash function, maybe the unit test should not test it via rte_hash_create (which seems to defeat the abstraction). -- David Marchand
