> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:22 PM
> To: Peng, ZhihongX <zhihongx.p...@intel.com>;
> david.march...@redhat.com; Burakov, Anatoly
> <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; step...@networkplumber.org;
> Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lin, Xueqin <xueqin....@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 3/4] pipeline: Fix compilation error with gcc ASan
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peng, ZhihongX <zhihongx.p...@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 4:11 PM
> > To: david.march...@redhat.com; Burakov, Anatoly
> > <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; step...@networkplumber.org;
> > Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
> > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lin, Xueqin <xueqin....@intel.com>; Peng, ZhihongX
> > <zhihongx.p...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v10 3/4] pipeline: Fix compilation error with gcc ASan
> >
> > From: Zhihong Peng <zhihongx.p...@intel.com>
> >
> > The gcc will check code more stricter when ASan enabled.
> > "Control reaches end of non-void function" error occurs here.
> >
> > Fixes: f38913b7fb8e ("pipeline: add meter array to SWX")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xueqin Lin <xueqin....@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Peng <zhihongx.p...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v7: no change
> > v8: no change
> > v9: Modify the submit log
> > v10:no change
> > ---
> > lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline.c
> > b/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline.c index 1cd09a4b44..0acd6c6752 100644
> > --- a/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline.c
> > +++ b/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline.c
> > @@ -4642,7 +4642,7 @@ instr_meter_translate(struct rte_swx_pipeline *p,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - CHECK(0, EINVAL);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > static inline void
> > @@ -5937,7 +5937,7 @@ instr_translate(struct rte_swx_pipeline *p,
> > instr,
> > data);
> >
> > - CHECK(0, EINVAL);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > static struct instruction_data *
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
> NACK.
>
> This is a false issue, no bug is here. CHECK(0, EINVAL) translates to an
> unconditional return -EINVAL.
> Does this tool work correctly when macros are present? Maybe the tool
> should parse the preprocessed C code as opposed to initial C code?
Yes, this is not a bug, it just solves the problem that cannot be passed after
adding the asan compiler option.
Only part of the macro reports errors, which may be caused by the tool itself,
but this tool is part of gcc and clang, so we still have to make the code not
report errors.
> Regards,
> Cristian
