On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22 at gmail.com>

Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me. 

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c 
> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES 128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int last_detached = 0;
Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of 
"last_detached".

>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>       device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>               if (dev != NULL)

We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so maybe flip
this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we can dedent
everything below that follows it.

>                       for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
>                               if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -                                             pci_get_device(dev) == 
> devices[i].dev)
> +                                             pci_get_device(dev) == 
> devices[i].dev) {
> +                                                     if (last_detached+1 < 
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
I don't think you need the +1 here.

> +                                                             
> printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> +                                                             
> detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> +                                                     }
> +                                                     else {
> +                                                             
> printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be 
> reattached\n",
> +                                                                     
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> +                                                     }
DPDK coding style is not to put braces around single-line statements like this.


> +                                                             
Remove whitespace from this new line.

>                                                       device_detach(dev);
> +                             }
>       }
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +     int i;
> +     printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> +             printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for 
> dev=%p...\n",
> +                     detached_devices[i]);
> +             device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> +             printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +     }
> +
> +     printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.1.2
> 

Reply via email to