> +/* Macro to add a capability */ > +#define QAT_SYM_PLAIN_AUTH_CAP(n, b, d)
Can you add a comment for each of the defines, specifying what these
variables (n,b,d,k,a,I etc)depict.
> \
> + { \
> + .op = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> \
> + {.sym = { \
> + .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH,
> \
> + {.auth = { \
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_##n,
> \
> + b, d \
> + }, } \
> + }, } \
> + }
> +
> +#define QAT_SYM_AUTH_CAP(n, b, k, d, a, i) \
> + { \
> + .op = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> \
> + {.sym = { \
> + .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH,
> \
> + {.auth = { \
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_##n,
> \
> + b, k, d, a, i \
> + }, } \
> + }, } \
> + }
> +
> +#define QAT_SYM_AEAD_CAP(n, b, k, d, a, i) \
> + { \
> + .op = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> \
> + {.sym = { \
> + .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD,
> \
> + {.aead = { \
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_##n,
> \
> + b, k, d, a, i \
> + }, } \
> + }, } \
> + }
> +
> +#define QAT_SYM_CIPHER_CAP(n, b, k, i)
> \
> + { \
> + .op = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> \
> + {.sym = { \
> + .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER,
> \
> + {.cipher = { \
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_##n,
> \
> + b, k, i \
> + }, } \
> + }, } \
> + }
> +
> extern uint8_t qat_sym_driver_id;
>
> +extern struct qat_crypto_gen_dev_ops qat_sym_gen_dev_ops[];
> +
> int
> qat_sym_dev_create(struct qat_pci_device *qat_pci_dev,
> struct qat_dev_cmd_param *qat_dev_cmd_param);
> --
> 2.25.1
