> -----Original Message-----
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 5:19 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; m...@ashroe.eu; Wang, Yipeng1
> <yipeng1.w...@intel.com>; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>;
> nd <n...@arm.com>; Medvedkin, Vladimir <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>;
> nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: promote APIs to stable
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:38:58 -0500
> > Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > --- a/lib/hash/rte_hash.h
> > > +++ b/lib/hash/rte_hash.h
> > > @@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ rte_hash_get_key_with_position(const struct
> > rte_hash *h, const int32_t position,
> > > * - 0 if freed successfully
> > > * - -EINVAL if the parameters are invalid.
> > > */
> > > -__rte_experimental
> > > int
> > > rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h,
> > > const int32_t position);
> >
> >
> > Need to remove @warning EXPERIMENTAL in comment.
> Agreed
>
> >
> >
> > What about all the other experimental functions in here?
> > It looks like all of them should be promoted.
> I just changed the symbol that was reported by the tool.
> rte_thash_*** were added on 4/19/2021. Vladimir, are you ok with
> promoting them?
>
> Yipeng, if you are fine, I can promote rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk,
> rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data and rte_hash_max_key_id. These
> are around more than a year.
[Wang, Yipeng]
Thanks Honnappa, please go ahead and have them in your patch. Thanks a lot!
