On 10/13/21 4:37 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> Copy public function pointers (rx_pkt_burst(), etc.) and related
> pointers to internal data from rte_eth_dev structure into a
> separate flat array. That array will remain in a public header.
> The intention here is to make rte_eth_dev and related structures internal.
> That should allow future possible changes to core eth_dev structures
> to be transparent to the user and help to avoid ABI/API breakages.
> The plan is to keep minimal part of data from rte_eth_dev public,
> so we still can use inline functions for fast-path calls
> (like rte_eth_rx_burst(), etc.) to avoid/minimize slowdown.
> The whole idea beyond this new schema:
> 1. PMDs keep to setup fast-path function pointers and related data
>    inside rte_eth_dev struct in the same way they did it before.
> 2. Inside rte_eth_dev_start() and inside rte_eth_dev_probing_finish()
>    (for secondary process) we call eth_dev_fp_ops_setup, which
>    copies these function and data pointers into rte_eth_fp_ops[port_id].
> 3. Inside rte_eth_dev_stop() and inside rte_eth_dev_release_port()
>    we call eth_dev_fp_ops_reset(), which resets rte_eth_fp_ops[port_id]
>    into some dummy values.
> 4. fast-path ethdev API (rte_eth_rx_burst(), etc.) will use that new
>    flat array to call PMD specific functions.
> That approach should allow us to make rte_eth_devices[] private
> without introducing regression and help to avoid changes in drivers code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>

Reply via email to