Hi Wang,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Jie1X <jie1x.w...@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 11:16 AM
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: support PPPoL2TPv2oUDP
> RSS Hash
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 11:32 PM
> > To: Wang, Jie1X <jie1x.w...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas
> > Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru; Li,
> > Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com>; Yang, SteveX <stevex.y...@intel.com>;
> > Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> > <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Wu, Wenjun1 <wenjun1...@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: support
> > PPPoL2TPv2oUDP RSS Hash
> >
> > Hi Jie,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Jie Wang
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 1:25 PM
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: support
> > > PPPoL2TPv2oUDP RSS Hash
> > >
> > > Add support for test-pmd to parse protocol pattern L2TPv2 and PPP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wenjun Wu <wenjun1...@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jie Wang <jie1x.w...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c index
> > > bb22294dd3..3c9bcabd97 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > @@ -299,6 +299,8 @@ enum index {
> > > ITEM_GENEVE_OPT_TYPE,
> > > ITEM_GENEVE_OPT_LENGTH,
> > > ITEM_GENEVE_OPT_DATA,
> > > + ITEM_PPP,
> > > + ITEM_L2TPV2,
> > > ITEM_INTEGRITY,
> > > ITEM_INTEGRITY_LEVEL,
> > > ITEM_INTEGRITY_VALUE,
> > > @@ -997,6 +999,8 @@ static const enum index next_item[] = {
> > > ITEM_AH,
> > > ITEM_PFCP,
> > > ITEM_ECPRI,
> > > + ITEM_PPP,
> > > + ITEM_L2TPV2,
> >
> > Why in the middle?
> >
>
> Ok, I will update it.
>
> > > ITEM_GENEVE_OPT,
> > > ITEM_INTEGRITY,
> > > ITEM_CONNTRACK,
> > > @@ -1368,6 +1372,16 @@ static const enum index item_integrity_lv[] = {
> > > ZERO,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const enum index item_ppp[] = {
> > > + ITEM_NEXT,
> > > + ZERO,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const enum index item_l2tpv2[] = {
> > > + ITEM_NEXT,
> > > + ZERO,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static const enum index next_action[] = {
> > > ACTION_END,
> > > ACTION_VOID,
> > > @@ -3579,6 +3593,20 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
> > > (sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_geneve_opt),
> > > ITEM_GENEVE_OPT_DATA_SIZE)),
> > > },
> > > + [ITEM_PPP] = {
> > > + .name = "ppp",
> > > + .help = "match ppp header",
> > > + .priv = PRIV_ITEM(PPP, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ppp)),
> > > + .next = NEXT(item_ppp),
> > > + .call = parse_vc,
> > > + },
> > > + [ITEM_L2TPV2] = {
> > > + .name = "l2tpv2",
> > > + .help = "match l2tpv2 header",
> > > + .priv = PRIV_ITEM(L2TPV2, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv2)),
> > > + .next = NEXT(item_l2tpv2),
> > > + .call = parse_vc,
> > > + },
> > > [ITEM_INTEGRITY] = {
> > > .name = "integrity",
> > > .help = "match packet integrity", @@ -8343,6 +8371,12 @@
> > > flow_item_default_mask(const struct
> > rte_flow_item *item)
> > > case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PFCP:
> > > mask = &rte_flow_item_pfcp_mask;
> > > break;
> > > + case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_L2TPV2:
> > > + mask = &rte_flow_item_l2tpv2_mask;
> > > + break;
> > > + case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PPP:
> > > + mask = &rte_flow_item_ppp_mask;
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see that you added the ability
> > to match on any of the header fields value.
> > You also didn't update the code of encap (from my understanding this
> > is a tunnel
> > header)
> >
> > Best,
> > Ori
>
> Hi Ori,
>
> This feature is only support for iavf enable PPPoL2TPv2oUDP rss. So it
> doesn't need to add the ability
> to match on any of the header fields value and the code of encap.
>
> I'm not sure if it is necessary to add these.
You added a lot of fields in the rte_flow and you don't give any way to test
them.
also Iike I said in previous patch what is the relation between matching items
to RSS?
You didn't add it to the RSS possible support.
Best,
Ori
