As stated in the API, dynamic field and flags should be created with no additional flag (simply in the API for future changes).
Fix the dynamic flag register helper which was not enforcing it and add unit tests. Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags") Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> --- app/test/test_mbuf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c index 9a248dfaea..82777109dc 100644 --- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c +++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c @@ -2577,6 +2577,16 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool) .align = 3, .flags = 0, }; + const struct rte_mbuf_dynfield dynfield_fail_flag = { + .name = "test-dynfield", + .size = sizeof(uint8_t), + .align = __alignof__(uint8_t), + .flags = 1, + }; + const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag dynflag_fail_flag = { + .name = "test-dynflag", + .flags = 1, + }; const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag dynflag = { .name = "test-dynflag", .flags = 0, @@ -2638,6 +2648,14 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool) if (ret != -1) GOTO_FAIL("dynamic field creation should fail (not avail)"); + ret = rte_mbuf_dynfield_register(&dynfield_fail_flag); + if (ret != -1) + GOTO_FAIL("dynamic field creation should fail (invalid flag)"); + + ret = rte_mbuf_dynflag_register(&dynflag_fail_flag); + if (ret != -1) + GOTO_FAIL("dynamic flag creation should fail (invalid flag)"); + flag = rte_mbuf_dynflag_register(&dynflag); if (flag == -1) GOTO_FAIL("failed to register dynamic flag, flag=%d: %s", diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c index ca46eb279e..d55e162a68 100644 --- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c +++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c @@ -498,6 +498,10 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_register_bitnum(const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag *params, { int ret; + if (params->flags != 0) { + rte_errno = EINVAL; + return -1; + } if (req >= RTE_SIZEOF_FIELD(struct rte_mbuf, ol_flags) * CHAR_BIT && req != UINT_MAX) { rte_errno = EINVAL; -- 2.23.0