12/10/2021 10:47, Jerin Jacob:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:05 PM Kundapura, Ganapati
> <ganapati.kundap...@intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com>
> > > > --- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
> > > > +++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
> > > > @@ -216,6 +216,10 @@ struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_stats {
> > > > /**< Eventdev enqueue count */
> > > > uint64_t rx_enq_retry;
> > > > /**< Eventdev enqueue retry count */
> > > > + uint64_t rx_event_buf_count;
> > > > + /**< Rx event buffered count */
> > > > + uint64_t rx_event_buf_size;
> > >
> > >
> > > Isn't ABI breakage? CI did not warn this. Isn't this a public structure?
> > Please confirm if moving the above two members to end of the structure
> > overcomes ABI breakage?
>
>
> + @Ray Kinsella @Thomas Monjalon @David Marchand
>
> It will still break the ABI. IMO, Since it is an ABI breaking release
> it is OK. If there are no other objections, Please move the variable
> to end
> of the structure and update release notes for ABI changes.
Why moving since it breaks ABI anyway?
I think you can keep as is.
