On 10/5/21 7:39 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 29/09/2021 16:52, dkozl...@oss.nvidia.com: >> From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozl...@oss.nvidia.com> >> >> Mempool is a generic allocator that is not necessarily used for device >> IO operations and its memory for DMA. Add MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO flag to mark >> such mempools. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozl...@oss.nvidia.com> >> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com> >> --- >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst | 3 +++ >> lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst >> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst >> index f85dc99c8b..873beda633 100644 >> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst >> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst >> @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ API Changes >> +* mempool: Added ``MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO`` flag to give a hint to DPDK components >> + that objects from this pool will not be used for device IO (e.g. DMA). > > This is not a breaking change, but I am OK to add this note. > Any other opinion?
Why is it in API changes section? Shouldn't it be in "New Features"?
