> > > > +struct rte_eth_fp_ops {
> > > > +
> > > > + /** first 64B line */
> > > > + eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst;
> > > > + /**< PMD receive function. */
> > > > + eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst;
> > > > + /**< PMD transmit function. */
> > > > + eth_tx_prep_t tx_pkt_prepare;
> > > > + /**< PMD transmit prepare function. */
> > > > + eth_rx_queue_count_t rx_queue_count;
> > > > + /**< Get the number of used RX descriptors. */
> > > > + eth_rx_descriptor_status_t rx_descriptor_status;
> > > > + /**< Check the status of a Rx descriptor. */
> > > > + eth_tx_descriptor_status_t tx_descriptor_status;
> > > > + /**< Check the status of a Tx descriptor. */
> > > > + uintptr_t reserved[2];
> > >
> > > uintptr_t size is not fix.
> > > I think you mean uint64_t.
> >
> > Nope, I meant 'uintptr_t' here.
> > That way it fits really nicely to both 64-bit and 32-bit systems.
> > For 64-bit systems we have all function pointers on first 64B line,
> > and all data pointers on second 64B line.
> > For 32-bit systems we have all fields within first 64B line.
>
> OK but then the next comment is partially wrong:
True.
In fact, after I replied to you, just thought that might be
better to have first 64B line for RX functions and data,
second 64B line for TX functions and data.
Will probably give it a try.
Anyway, will update the comment.
>
> > > > +
> > > > + /** second 64B line */
> > > > + struct rte_ethdev_qdata rxq;
> > > > + struct rte_ethdev_qdata txq;
> > > > + uintptr_t reserved2[4];
> > > > +
> > > > +} __rte_cache_aligned;
>
>
