Hi Andrew and Ivan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 4:47 PM
> Subject: [PATCH v1 01/12] ethdev: add ethdev item to flow API
>
> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
>
> For use with "transfer" flows. Supposed to match traffic transmitted by the
> DPDK application via the specified ethdev, at e-switch level.
>
> Must not be combined with attributes "ingress" / "egress".
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
> ---
[Snip]
> /** Generate flow_action[] entry. */
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index
> 7b1ed7f110..880502098e 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -574,6 +574,15 @@ enum rte_flow_item_type {
> * @see struct rte_flow_item_conntrack.
> */
> RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_CONNTRACK,
> +
> + /**
> + * [META]
> + *
> + * Matches traffic at e-switch going from (sent by) the given ethdev.
> + *
> + * @see struct rte_flow_item_ethdev
> + */
> + RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETHDEV,
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -1799,6 +1808,24 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_conntrack
> rte_flow_item_conntrack_mask = { }; #endif
>
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
> + *
> + * Provides an ethdev ID for use with items which are as follows:
> + * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETHDEV.
> + */
> +struct rte_flow_item_ethdev {
> + uint16_t id; /**< Ethdev ID */
True for all above uses,
should this be renamed to port?
> +};
> +
> +/** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETHDEV */ #ifndef
> __cplusplus
> +static const struct rte_flow_item_ethdev rte_flow_item_ethdev_mask = {
> + .id = 0xffff,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * Matching pattern item definition.
> *
> --
> 2.30.2
