Hi Ajit,
On 01/10/2021 00:48, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
::::
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
index 97ae52e17e..7a8da3d7ab 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
@@ -1485,10 +1485,36 @@ static void
init_config_port_offloads(portid_t pid, uint32_t socket_id)
{
struct rte_port *port = &ports[pid];
+ uint64_t rx_meta_features = 0;
uint16_t data_size;
int ret;
int i;
+ rx_meta_features |= RTE_ETH_RX_META_USER_FLAG;
+ rx_meta_features |= RTE_ETH_RX_META_USER_MARK;
+ rx_meta_features |= RTE_ETH_RX_META_TUNNEL_ID;
+
+ ret = rte_eth_rx_meta_negotiate(pid, &rx_meta_features);
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ if (!(rx_meta_features & RTE_ETH_RX_META_USER_FLAG)) {
+ TESTPMD_LOG(INFO, "Flow action FLAG will not affect Rx mbufs
on port %u\n",
Log level info might be a little too noisy?
Do you really think so? But main() sets default log level to DEBUG, quote:
rte_log_set_level(testpmd_logtype, RTE_LOG_DEBUG);
If I go for DEBUG instead of INFO here, it won't get any quieter, will it?
+ pid);
+ }
+
+ if (!(rx_meta_features & RTE_ETH_RX_META_USER_MARK)) {
+ TESTPMD_LOG(INFO, "Flow action MARK will not affect Rx mbufs
on port %u\n",
+ pid);
+ }
+
+ if (!(rx_meta_features & RTE_ETH_RX_META_TUNNEL_ID)) {
+ TESTPMD_LOG(INFO, "Flow tunnel offload support might be
limited or unavailable on port %u\n",
+ pid);
+ }
:::
--
Ivan M
