>
> Update ipsec_xform definition to include ESN field.
> This allows the application to control the ESN starting value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.dohe...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nico...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha <abhijit.si...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin Buckley <daniel.m.buck...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>
> ---
> lib/security/rte_security.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/security/rte_security.h b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> index 84ba1b08f8..1bd09e3cc2 100644
> --- a/lib/security/rte_security.h
> +++ b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> @@ -240,6 +240,14 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform {
> */
> uint32_t mss;
> /**< IPsec payload Maximum Segment Size */
> + union {
> + uint64_t value;
> + struct {
> + uint32_t low;
> + uint32_t hi;
Do we really need low/hi here?
As I remember ESN is 64bit value, no?
> + };
> + } esn;
> + /**< Extended Sequence Number */
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
