Hi Anoob,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thursday 23 September 2021 12:09
>To: Power, Ciara <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal
><[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; Zhang,
>Roy Fan <[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin
><[email protected]>
>Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Archana Muniganti
><[email protected]>; Tejasree Kondoj <[email protected]>;
>Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; Nicolau, Radu
><[email protected]>; Gagandeep Singh <[email protected]>;
>[email protected]
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/5] test/crypto: add lookaside IPsec tests
>
>Hi Ciara,
>
>Please see inline.
>
>Thanks,
>Anoob
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Power, Ciara <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:09 PM
>> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal
>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>;
>> Zhang, Roy Fan <[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Archana Muniganti
>> <[email protected]>; Tejasree Kondoj <[email protected]>;
>> Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; Nicolau, Radu
>> <[email protected]>; Gagandeep Singh <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH v4 1/5] test/crypto: add lookaside IPsec
>> tests
>>
>> External Email
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hi Anoob,
>>
>> One comment inline.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ciara
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>
>> >Sent: Friday 17 September 2021 14:15
>> >To: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan
>> ><[email protected]>; Zhang, Roy Fan <[email protected]>;
>> >Ananyev, Konstantin <[email protected]>
>> >Cc: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob
>> ><[email protected]>; Archana Muniganti <[email protected]>;
>> >Tejasree Kondoj <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal
>> ><[email protected]>; Nicolau, Radu <[email protected]>;
>> >Power, Ciara <[email protected]>; Gagandeep Singh
>> ><[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> >Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] test/crypto: add lookaside IPsec tests
>> >
>> >Added test case for lookaside IPsec. Inbound known vector tests are
>added.
>> >
>> >Cipher list: AES-GCM 128, 192 & 256
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>
>> >Signed-off-by: Tejasree Kondoj <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >---
>> > app/test/meson.build                               |   1 +
>> > app/test/test.h                                    |   6 +
>> > app/test/test_cryptodev.c                          | 232 +++++++++++++++
>> > app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c           | 212 ++++++++++++++
>> > app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h           |  66 +++++
>> > .../test_cryptodev_security_ipsec_test_vectors.h   | 321
>> >+++++++++++++++++++++
>> <snip>
>>
>> > #ifdef RTE_LIB_SECURITY
>> > static int
>> >+ipsec_proto_testsuite_setup(void)
>> >+{
>> >+   struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
>> >+   struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
>> >+   struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info;
>> >+   int ret = 0;
>> >+
>> >+   rte_cryptodev_info_get(ts_params->valid_devs[0], &dev_info);
>> >+
>> >+   if (!(dev_info.feature_flags & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY)) {
>> >+           RTE_LOG(INFO, USER1, "Feature flag requirements for IPsec
>> >Proto "
>> >+                           "testsuite not met\n");
>> >+           return TEST_SKIPPED;
>> >+   }
>> >+
>> >+   /* Reconfigure to enable security */
>> >+   dev_configure_and_start(RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SYMMETRIC_CRYPTO
>> >|
>> >+                           RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_ASYMMETRIC_CRYPTO);
>> >+
>> >+   /* Set action type */
>> >+   ut_params->type =
>> >RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL;
>> >+
>> >+   if (security_proto_supported(
>> >+
>> >    RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL,
>> >+                   RTE_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_IPSEC) < 0) {
>> >+           RTE_LOG(INFO, USER1, "Capability requirements for IPsec
>> >Proto "
>> >+                           "test not met\n");
>> >+           ret = TEST_SKIPPED;
>>
>> The device still needs to be stopped here I believe if capabilities not met.
>
>[Anoob] Here we are just setting return value. Function returns below only
>(after stopping device).
>

Apologies, yes I missed that. Thanks!

>>
>> >+   }
>> >+
>> >+   /* Stop the device */
>> >+   rte_cryptodev_stop(ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
>> >+
>> >+   return ret;
>> >+}
>> >+

Reply via email to