On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 7:15 AM Devendra Singh Rawat
<dsinghra...@marvell.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Sunday, August 8, 2021 6:22 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: bruce.richard...@intel.com; david.march...@redhat.com; Rasesh Mody
> <rm...@marvell.com>; Devendra Singh Rawat <dsinghra...@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/qede: fix minsize build
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Error occurs when configuring meson with --buildtype=minsize with GCC 11.1.0:
>
> In function ‘__internal_ram_wr_relaxed’,
> inlined from ‘internal_ram_wr’ at ecore_int_api.h:166:2,
> inlined from ‘qede_update_rx_prod.constprop’ at qede_rxtx.c:736:2:
> drivers/net/qede/base/bcm_osal.h:136:9: error:
> ‘rx_prods’ is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
> | rte_write32_relaxed((_val), (_reg_addr))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ecore_int_api.h:151:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘DIRECT_REG_WR_RELAXED’
> | DIRECT_REG_WR_RELAXED(p_hwfn, &((u32 OSAL_IOMEM *)addr)[i],
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c: In function ‘qede_update_rx_prod.constprop’:
> drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c:724:33: note: ‘rx_prods’ declared here
> | struct eth_rx_prod_data rx_prods = { 0 };
> | ^~~~~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
Can you configure your mail client so that it quotes the original mail
with some '> ' prefix?
Your reply confused patchwork which added back a SoB from Thomas.
> ---
> drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c
> index 298f4e3e42..35cde561ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c
> @@ -721,9 +721,10 @@ qede_update_rx_prod(__rte_unused struct qede_dev *edev,
> {
> uint16_t bd_prod = ecore_chain_get_prod_idx(&rxq->rx_bd_ring);
> uint16_t cqe_prod = ecore_chain_get_prod_idx(&rxq->rx_comp_ring);
> - struct eth_rx_prod_data rx_prods = { 0 };
> + struct eth_rx_prod_data rx_prods;
>
> /* Update producers */
> + memset(&rx_prods, 0, sizeof(rx_prods));
> rx_prods.bd_prod = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bd_prod);
> rx_prods.cqe_prod = rte_cpu_to_le_16(cqe_prod);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
> ACKed.
Please reply with a full tag so that patchwork catches it.
It saves me some time/brain cycles when applying patches.
Thanks.
--
David Marchand
